Darts Skool — 360 Performance Academy

Player Plus — Premium Tier

The Analytics Layer
Above Skool.

Already inside Skool? Player Plus is the upgrade — monthly reports, post-match reports, season tracking, and direct coaching feedback from Stuart.

The scoreboard tracks wins and losses. The AAI tracks what is actually happening underneath — attitude, attention, intention — month by month, match by match. That is what makes the coaching land.

The Foundation

Where Every Player Plus Member Starts

Three foundation reports build the baseline for everything that follows. The Player Type Quiz identifies how you naturally play. The Baseline Report captures where you are right now. The Goal Setting Report locks in where you want to be.

Together they generate your original AAI score and your first set of coaching tasks — built specifically from your answers, not a template. Every monthly report after that updates the picture and adjusts the focus.

Player Type Quiz

Identifies how you naturally think, compete, and respond under pressure. Your primary and secondary type shape every coaching task and report that follows.

Baseline Report

Captures your starting AAI score — Attitude, Attention, Intention — and establishes where the analytical work begins. Every monthly report is measured against this baseline.

Goal Setting Report

Locks in your Season Identity Goal and the specific outcomes you are working towards. Stuart builds your first coaching tasks directly from your answers.

EXAMPLE PREVIEW — Illustrative only. Full Player Plus reports contain significantly more depth and detail than shown here.

Example — Player Plus Monthly Report — All figures are illustrative

Monthly Performance Report

Report Period: April 2026 · Month 6 of Season · Player Type: Technical / Ice

Attitude · Attention · Intention

Attitude

7 /10

Tasks completed4 / 5

Behavioural rules held3 / 4

Measures tracked6 / 6

vs previous month+2

Task from data One behavioural rule went unmet. Identify which rule slipped and log the specific match moment where it broke down.

Attention

7 /10

Tasks completed3 / 5

Behavioural rules held2 / 4

Measures tracked5 / 6

vs previous month+3

Task from data Two rules unmet and two tasks incomplete — attention is the lagging pillar. Hold your pre-throw routine on every dart in your next three practice sessions without exception.

Intention

8 /10

Tasks completed5 / 5

Behavioural rules held4 / 4

Measures tracked6 / 6

vs previous month+1

Task from data Perfect completion across all tasks, rules, and measures. Extend the tracking this month by logging your first-dart target before each throw in practice.

Six-Month Performance History

Month	Attitude /10	Attention /10	Intention /10
November	6	6	7
December	7	6	7
January	7	6	8
February	7	7	8
March	7	7	8
April — current	7	7	8

Season Trajectory — Three Pillars

Attitude

Attention

Intention

Coaching Insight — April 2026

Stuart’s Analysis

Your Intention pillar is the strongest it has been all season — five from five tasks, all four behavioural rules held under match conditions. The pre-throw routine work is landing and it is beginning to become automatic. The focus this month is Attention. The data shows a consistent pattern: as match pressure increases, attention narrows onto outcome and pulls away from process. We are going to work directly on that pattern. The flat month in March makes sense given three separate events across a four-week window. The return to growth this month confirms the system is working. The direction is right. Now we push through the 75 ceiling.

April Coaching Tasks

After any missed double, execute the three-breath reset before stepping back from the oche. Practise in training until the response is automatic — not a conscious decision in the moment.

Before each finish attempt, hold your attention on the target for one full breath before stepping up. Track whether you held it — one word in your log after each match.

Complete the attention-anchoring exercise twice per week — fifteen minutes, replicating training conditions. Increase the difficulty level after week two.

EXAMPLE PREVIEW — Illustrative only. Full Player Plus reports contain significantly more depth and detail than shown here.

Example — Player Plus Post-Match Report — All figures are illustrative

Post-Match Report

Competition Review & Mental Performance

POST-MATCH

Player A — Warrior / Confidence Regional Open · April 2026

Competition

Regional Open — Runner-Up

Level:County Ranking Event

Date:April 2026

Feeling:Satisfied · 8/10

Stage	Result	Score	Notes
Round 1	Win	3–1	Highest opening-round average of the season
Round 2	Win	3–2	Dropped legs 3 & 4, recovered clean
Quarter-Final	Win	3–2	Strong finish under pressure, no carry-over
Semi-Final	Win	4–3	141 checkout at 3-3 to reach final
Final	Loss	4–5	Led 3–1, lost four legs in a row

First Open Final Reached SF 141 Checkout Under Pressure Routine Held Across Five Matches

Performance Snapshot — Under Pressure

Attitude

Held Under Load

8/10. Dropped two legs mid-tournament and reset immediately each time. No carry-over between rounds. Reset between R2 and QF was the cleanest of the season.

Held

Attention

Mostly Locked

7/10. Four clean matches. In the final, attention shifted to the scoreline around leg five when leading 3–1. Outcome-thinking crept in exactly when the lead felt largest.

Partly Held

Intention

Fully Committed

9/10. Pre-visit routine held across all five matches without exception. SF 141 was pre-decided before stepping up. Most consistent Intention score of the season.

Held

Task Accountability — Did Your Current Tasks Hold?

Attitude

“Control the controllables.”

After any dropped leg, reset in under two minutes. The next leg starts clean with no carry-over from what just happened.

Held Under Pressure?

Held

Between R2 and QF you dropped legs 3 and 4 consecutively — the pattern that historically unsettles your prep heading into the next round. You walked into the QF with no visible carry-over across the first three visits. The reset is now running automatically, not as a decision.

Attention

“Round 1 is the final’s first leg.”

Treat every early round with the same engagement as a deciding leg. No half-speed openers, no warming into the match.

Held Under Pressure?

Partly Held

R1 won 3-1 at your highest opening-round average of the season — the task is visible in the data. It held through R2, QF and SF. Broke down in the final when leading 3-1, attention moved to the scoreline and three legs followed to the opponent. Held in four from five matches. The one it didn’t hold in was the final. That is the next layer.

Intention

“Name it before you throw it.”

Pre-decide every visit. Target named internally before stepping up. No mid-approach changes, no decisions made at the oche.

Held Under Pressure?

Held

SF leg 11 at 5-5, needing 121, opponent waiting on 56. Pre-decided before stepping up: T20, T19, D12. Executed on the visit. That is the task working under the highest-pressure moment of your season so far — not in training, not in an early round. In a deciding leg with a final at stake.

Match Statistics — Regional Open

Three-Dart Average

84.2

Personal best for a five-match tournament day. +3.7 above your 90-day rolling average. Averages did not drop across consecutive matches.

Checkout %

42%

14 from 33 attempts. Above your 38% rolling baseline for ranking events. Highest competition finish of the season: 141.

180s

Across five matches. No match with zero 180s — maximum-score consistency held throughout the full day.

First 9 Avg

3.92

Darts per visit in the first-9 scoring. Rolling baseline: 4.1. Opening visits were the cleanest of the season.

What the Numbers Tell Us

The 84.2 average across five matches is the headline stat — but the more significant data point is that the average did not drop from match one to match five. Most players at this level see a 3–5 point decline across a full-day tournament as fatigue accumulates. Yours held. That is a focus management and endurance result, not just a darts result. The coaching work on pre-visit routine is showing in the consistency of the scoring output.

The 42% checkout rate is above your rolling baseline and above the event average for the level you competed at. The stat that matters most inside that number is the ratio of first-dart doubles hit to first-dart doubles missed. Your coaching record now tracks this as a separate metric going forward — the checkout percentage tells you the result; the first-dart double rate tells you where the margin lives.

What Worked · What Slipped

What Worked

+Reset between R2 and QF — dropped two legs, no carry-over visible in the next match.

+Highest opening-round average of the season — R1 engagement task now showing in the data.

+SF 141 at 3-3 under maximum pressure — pre-decided, executed, no mid-approach drift.

+Pre-visit routine held across all five matches for the first time this season.

+First Open Final reached — the level transition is confirmed and on the scoreboard.

What Slipped

-Final leg 5 — attention moved to the scoreline when 3-1 up. Four legs lost from that point.

-Outcome-thinking triggered by being ahead, not behind — a new pattern that needs specific work.

-Post-match frustration took longer to reach neutral than the task target — approx 25 minutes.

The Sentence To Sit With

“In the semi I wasn’t thinking about anything. Step up, name the target, throw. In the final, somewhere around leg five, I started thinking about winning. That’s when it shifted. The routine was still there but my head was somewhere else.”

This sentence is the next coaching cycle. The pre-visit routine didn’t disappear in the final — the attention context it runs inside did. The distinction matters: this is not a routine problem. It is an attention management problem triggered by a specific condition: a comfortable lead. That is a more precise target than anything we have had to work on before. And it means the next cycle has a clear entry point.

Key Learning — In Your Own Words

“The routine is there. The problem was that my head left the process before the match was over. I need to be able to hold the same headspace when I’m winning as when I’m level.”

What This Confirms

The Intention task is now running automatically under match pressure — the SF 141 proves it. The next layer is Attention under a specific condition: holding process focus when the scoreline creates noise in the direction of the win. That is a solvable problem. The May coaching cycle is built directly from this report.

Next Focus: Process Holding When Ahead

The June ranking event is the test. The target behaviour is not winning from 3-1 up — it is maintaining process focus from 3-1 up. The score is irrelevant to the routine. That is the principle. Building the automatic connection between a comfortable lead and a tighter process focus is the specific work for the next six weeks.

Coaching Read

Five matches, first Open Final, a 141 checkout in a deciding semi-final leg under maximum pressure. The Intention task has passed its hardest test of the season. The pre-visit routine is no longer something you choose to do — it runs automatically even when the match demands everything you have. That is the training goal for the past four months, confirmed on the scoreboard.

The final loss is data, not failure. You have now experienced the specific conditions that break your attention: a comfortable lead with the win visible. You hadn’t experienced it before because you had not been in a position to. Now you have. Now we know the trigger, the moment, and the internal pattern that needs the next layer of work. A routine win from 3-1 up in that final would have given us nothing to build on.

First Open Final reached. SF 141 under maximum pressure. Intention task confirmed automatic. Attention under a comfortable lead is the May target. That is the exact layer the data identified and the next coaching cycle addresses it directly.

Join Player Plus 💬 Ask Stuart About Player Plus